Monday, March 31, 2008

The McCain Girls: Holy Shit

When I first saw the McCain Girls Video I was stunned. I didn't know what the fuck to make of it.


Maybe they just made a mall karaoke music video for fun. I thought maybe they just uploaded a video that blew up and went viral beyond their wildest dreams.

Now, after hearing her response video, I don't know what to say.


I think she is fucking serious. This is beyond words. Seriously, I got nothing.
Fuck.

Sunday, March 30, 2008

The Iraq War, Where Movies Go To Die


Even Ryan Philippe couldn't save Stoploss this weekend. It's numbers look absolutely abysmal.

Sadder yet, it got blown out of the water by fucking Superhero Movie, the umpteenth superhero parody this year.

Tracy Morgan should have made Fat Bitch 2.

But this is hardly news. It seems every Iraq War film released in the past few years has fallen on deaf ears. It seems this War is a place where good movies go to die.

Are people apathetic, yes. It seems that after 9/11, we as a whole(No one, not even Anti-war folks are watching these movies), prefer escapism in the movies. And on TV. It to me is the main difference between Vietnam and Today. Then, nightly news actually showed what War looked like, people made movies about the War that people went to. Nowadays, thata don' happena so much-a.

I'm just as guilty as the next person. Sure, I could have seen Lions for Lambs, but I wanted to watch Zombies. And Milla Jojovich cuz she's naked in every one of those movies.

Still I'm not giving up hope. Someone will eventually make a powerful film on this war that people will see. Let's just hope it doesn't take untill 2034 for that to happen.

Thursday, March 27, 2008

American Idol's Jason Castro is the Antichrist


This thing scares me.

It got famous by covering Jeff Buckley's Hallelughaahahga(I thinks thats hows its spelled)

I'm not sure what it is but it scares the living shit out of me.

I think its the Antichrist.

Worst Graphs Ever



My Poli-Sci teacher today showed us this graph, which he declared is the worst graph ever.


While this graph is mind-numbingly stupid, at least it's visually appealing. He then challenged the class that if anyone could find a worse graph he would give them an A.

I came home and did a google search for "worst graph ever". I found this

and this
Publish Post
I'm getting an A.

I'm Not Racist, But...



If I had a dollar for every time I heard a statement start with the words, "I'm not racist, but ..." I would be a very rich man.

No matter what massively bigoted statement follows, they seem more preoccupied with trying to convince others (and/or themselves) that they are not racist.

The question must be asked: If ignorance remains as it does, and people are more frightened of being perceived as ignorant than of being ignorant, are we making any progress?

Race relations are complex and difficult, yet it seems in the many years since the civil rights movement, image has outweighed substance. People have ceased being real with themselves and others.

Usually the "I'm not racist, but . . . " is followed by some statement like, "black people are loud" or, "Mexicans don't have insurance." These statements are laced with emotions and are derived from our stereotypes. Stereotypes, however, are not the fundamental problem.

We need stereotypes. They are necessary for our brain to process information. At any given second, your senses are being bombarded with all types of datasets, which are simultaneously being processed. To make any sort of sense of this monstrous stream of information, your brain groups things into categories. Racial stereotypes are no different; everyone has internalized racial stereotypes.

Stereotypes do contribute negatively to race relations. If you perceive another group as untrustworthy or dangerous, chances are you will not want to associate with them. Barack Obama's recent speech on race addressed the stereotype problem. He mentioned his white grandmother, "Who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe."

He went further to try to address the anger and resentment that built through time in both the white and black communities. He went on to ask America to have a real dialogue, one that looks at the root causes of problems rather than choose demagogues. Conservative talk radio of course chooses the demagogue route.

Rush Limbaugh is the perfect case study of the modern angry white male. He rails all day about the ills of our "liberal welfare state," and what he sees as ethnic favoritism toward minorities. The problem, of course, is that Limbaugh is wrong and a liar. According to his housekeeper Wilma Cline, he on enough "hillbilly heroin" to kill a small donkey at the same time he proclaimed that the drug dealers should get the death penalty.

But the reason he is wrong isn't because of his ignorant and uniformed stances, or the fact he gets higher than Amy Winehouse. Limbaugh is wrong because he contradicts his core principles constantly.

According to a column he wrote, Limbaugh believes in working toward a "color-blind society." Essentially, he wants no special treatment for anyone whatsoever. Of course, he doesn't take into account the very unequal playing field that already exists in America. Of course, he perpetuates the vilest of racial stereotypes (just listen to the song, "Barack the Magic Negro," he aired on his radio show).

But Limbaugh isn't racist; he is just working toward a post-racial America, just like Clarence Thomas and Alan Keyes.

Limbaugh and his ilk fuel this idea of white oppression, but they didn't invent it. Rush became popular because he voiced the ignorance that was just under the surface. Political correctness, no matter how well intentioned, produced a backlash because the "silent white majority" felt that its freedoms were under assault.

Race relations are complex and difficult. But progress isn't made without open and honest dialogue. We are kidding ourselves if we expect to have discussions on issues such as race without understanding they will be uncomfortable.

Ignorance is uncomfortable, but it is here to stay.

I actually agree with Limbaugh that we should move toward a post-racial society, and that speech should never be censored. In order to accomplish this, however, a balanced open and honest dialogue should begin.

The Daily Show did a segment after Obama's speech where Jon Stewart and his "black correspondent" Larry Willmore had a hilarious and uncomfortable frank race discussion. Stewart asked questions like, "Why do your car stereos have to be so loud?" and Willmore asked, "Why do you ruin music?"

The jokes that are funniest are the ones that show us truths about ourselves.

So rather than worry about being perceived as ignorant, just be ignorant. That does not mean use racial slurs or derogatory comments, it means say what you really feel without trying to qualify it. The more open and honest you are with your feelings, the easier it is to examine why it is you feel that way.

That is how we will learn and move forward as a country. Progress is a slow process, but when the ball starts rolling in the right direction, nothing can stop it.

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Hillary's Rainbow Over Texas



We are yet to see whether Hillary's Bosnia lie will be played out by the MSM in the next few days. Regardless, she is running out of money and support real quick. One thing is for sure, the CBS bosnia expose has over 2 mllion views in all of its various forms, and that number is rising.

She of course brought this on herself, but one wonders, will this be her "Rainbow over Texas". If you don't know what that phrase refers to(I didn't untill 10 minutes ago), it refers to a Roy Rogers film where he plays himself as a glam-cowboy singer in texas.

According to Wikipedia, "since that time, "rainbow over Texas" has become a colloquialism for anyone who self-aggrandizes their own life in mythic and fantastical terms. For example, an individual who confabulates their previous experiences or resume out of either ignorance or self-importance is liked to a "rainbow over Texas".

Now that her credibility is coming into question, some are predicataing an avalanche of negative press, "vetting" her claims on everything from NAFTA and Ireland to the SCHIP bill. I am not putting all my faith on the MSM to all of a sudden do its job, but at this point they smell blood, and they are sharks at the end of the day.

Regardless she brought this on herself. She was the one to decide on the scorched earth, kitchen sink, me or no-one approach, exemplified by her recent "sudden" rehashing of the Wright nonsense. What goes around comes around.

Monday, March 24, 2008

Clinton Tax Returns Theories

So according to Sam Stein at the Huffington Post, Hillary intends to release her Tax returns just a few days before the PA primary.

"On a conference call with reporters, Howard Wolfson offered a "categorical yes" when asked if the New York Democrat would make public this information with enough time to spare so that voters in the Keystone State could review it."

I have 3 theories on why they would release these returns just 3 days before the (crucial to her) Pennsylvania election.

Theory 1.
In hopes of a weekend news cycle being less intense than say a monday or tuesday morning story(like the Wright controversy) they release the Returns into the mix on a Saturday or Sunday to try and lessen the blow. Any attacks that are made on the Tax returns the Clinton Camp will spin as just last minute Election mud-slinging on the part of Obama.

Theory 2.
They don't plan on actually releasing them. At least not the full ones. Just like they did with her schedules as First Lady, they will release the returns with partial sections Blacked out, especally those in relation to the 5 Million Dollar loan she gave her campaign.

Theory 3.
She plans on releasing them right before the election in a State she is all but certain to win in order to try and substantiate this idea that she has been "vetted". She will essentially use the PA win she almost certainly will gain as a way to essentially release a negative story and swuash it 2 days later in the news cycle.

It could also be a combination of two or all three of these theories.

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Clinton News Network is at it again

Ok, now this is just getting ridiculous. Oh and to say choosing this picture isn't deliberate is stupid, they defintiely choose it. He looks like he has Down Syndrome in this photo. Oh and notice what the article is in reference to.

People say that all pictures of HIllary are bad ones. That's just cuz she's ugly
On the inside.


UPDATE
From www.cracked.com

Hillary Attended Superman's Funeral with Lex Luthor


Echo Chamber Zeitgeist

After any debate, primary, caucus or other media-worthy event, modern political campaigns send their best storytellers to a reporter's feeding frenzy. Here these "masters of political spin" attempt to create the most compelling media narrative about their candidate for the subsequent news cycle.

Matt Taibbi, a reporter for Rolling Stone, recently did a segment for "Real Time With Bill Maher" on these political spin rooms. Aside from showing how ridiculous these events are backstage, Taibbi correctly observed that these places are essentially "echo chambers," wherein "common knowledge" is manufactured and then readily accepted as literal truth.

Ultimately, the media is telling a story. William Randolph Hearst was the first of the modern media barons to realize that facts don't sell papers, sensationalism does. Since ultimately the media's goal is to make money, it constantly develops narratives that follow common literary arcs (falls from grace, David vs. Goliath and redemption) that tell stories rather than explain them.

What allows some of the modern media to do this so well are the echo chambers. These chambers legitimize false information through heavy media coverage even if it is acknowledged in the story as inaccurate or wrong. Essentially, they echo lies enough times to make them a part of the collective conscious; they lie so much that they make it truth.

Case and point, Supery-Duper Tuesday II (or whatever they called it). The facts are that Hillary Clinton, after losing 12 consecutive states, was barely able to hold on to Texas, Rhode Island and Ohio. Texas and Ohio, which her campaign once touted as their 20 point-plus lead "firewall" states, made a significant shift toward Obama. In turn, he was able to make all these inroads despite an avalanche of Clinton-orchestrated negative press.

And when the dust settles (the Texas caucus results aren't all in yet, but I got $20 on Obama), Hillary will still be losing by nearly the same amount of delegates that she was before Tuesday.

But this is not the story. The headlines are, "She's Back" and, "She has the wind at her back." Her campaign, which originally said it was about delegates and not momentum, has now attempted to craft its resurrection through a narrative of momentum they originally dismissed.

It hurts my head.

But this echo chamber reality we live in doesn't just apply to presidential campaigns. This how we ended up as bad as we are in Iraq. Karl Rove understood that if you said something untrue enough times, you could make it true. If you need further proof, just turn on Fox News.

Right now. Go ahead.

See, they just lied. Told ya.

This is why, as a country, we believed there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. This is why we thought Iraq had something to do with Sept. 11. This is why right now, in Iraq, we think that the majority of whom we are fighting is "al Qaeda" and our "surge" is working.

Through talk radio, 24 cable networks and now the blogosphere, the powers that be have created such a powerful echo chamber that we now live in an Orwellian reality. That is why people believe that war is peace, up is down and Barack Obama is a Muslim.

Zeitgeist is a term that is used to refer to the commonly perceived truths or ethos of a particular group. Echo chambers have manufactured our false zeitgeists.

As the prophet George Carlin once said, "Don't take any shit from the Zeitgeist."

Just Say No

Eli Lilly developed Fluoxetine hydrochloride, better known as Prozac as an antidepressant throughout the 70’s and 80’s. It has been used to treat a broad array of mental health disorders including (but not limited to) clinical depression, obsessive compulsive disorder, bulimia nervosa, premenstrual dysphoric disorder and Hypochondria.

Thats a fuck-ton of problems to solve for one pill.

Prozac made its US debut in 1987 and quickly became a mega hit. The patent expired in 2001(after making Eli Lilly obscenely rich) and the generic version is still extremely popular today. In 2006 23.1 Million prescriptions were given for generic Prozac making it number 3 on that year’s legal drug top 5 list, which provides a glimpse at the size of the Behemoth Legal drug industry.

Problem with Prozac is that it doesn’t really work. At least not as well as Drug Companies say it does.

The truth is that the pharmaceutical industry isn’t in the business of curing. That would be bad business. They are in the industry of treatment, which keeps people on prescriptions for long periods of time.

You can see this principle illustrated in this flowchart.

They are a business, whose sole goal is to make money, and the way they make money is by having more people buy their Product. So they sell their product and look at numbers the same way that GE does with washing machines. Only problem is that Prozac isn’t a washing machine.

A great book on the subject is “The Truth about Drug Companies: How they Deceive Us and What to Do About It” by Dr. Marcia Angell the former editor of The New England Journal Of Medicine.

There is a good Mother Jones Interview with her here.

She refutes the major lie of pharmaceutical companies, that they are “powerhouses of innovation” and their profits are deserved and than “fairly” reinvested into new Research and Development to help humanity.

Bullshit Ex. Figure 1.1


She shows how these companies actually invest 2.5 times more money in marketing and advertising their products than they do in new research and development. Again, smart moves if you’re in the business of selling washing machines, unethical if you’re selling Prozac.

But it doesn’t stop there, Dr. Angell goes on to show that about 75% of the “new drugs” they market are “me-too” drugs, which are essentially the same(if not worse) than other drugs already on the market

They claim that they are free-market adherents, yet vie for government handout “research grants”. They take drugs developed at Universities, grossly inflate the price to the American Consumer and compensate those researchers and schools with next to nothing. One more time, this kind of business is smart if you’re selling washing machines, but it is downright evil if you are selling Prozac.

What these companies do is use Drug “Representatives”(salesman) to employ every underhanded trick in the book(cakes for your daughters birthdays, golf in Fiji etc.) to get doctors to prescribe their medication.

Would you like to be a rep why just click here. Seriously this site is probably beautiful in how it illustrates how far from reality this whole industry is.

And for more information on Drug Reps check out the story of Shahram Ahari who worked for Eli Lilly for two years selling Prozac and Zyprexa.

Sure they use in-house studies, and fancy color coded charts to convince doctors that their “medicine” is helpful, but so did Cigarette Companies.

Remember, 9 out of 10 doctors smoked Camels.

When asked if they are swayed by Drug Reps, most doctors say very little or not at all. But when asked about how they think their peers are persuaded, they respond that their peers are very influenced by these same reps. This disconnect is intentional and keeps these companies laughing all the way to the bank.

This brings us full circle back to Prozac.

A study published last month showed that Prozac and similar drugs did not have a significant difference in treating depression than a placebo except in the most severe cases.

We continue to feed an industry that goal is to hook us on inferior products, with no regard for consequence. Today, Parents and Doctors alike must concede that there is no magic Pill substitution for Parenting or Therapy, and finally starve this beast.

This is by no means a call for people to flush their pills down the toilet.

In fact, withdrawal is one of the most difficult problems associated with prescriptions drugs.
These chemicals are way too dangerous to play around with, and Doctors are essential in making sure that any change that it is done safely.

Someone once told me that sunny days were nothing; without the rainy ones nothing has substance.

Just about Every great Artist, Politician and Writer has suffered from depression.

For an incomplete list, click here.

That just made you feel better didn't it?

Mental health is a complex, and medication can be helpful. But without a serious examination of the cause of one’s depression, coupled with a constructive healing method like therapy no real progress can be made. Root problems don’t go away when masked by drugs, be they legal or not.

Depression may just be nature’s way of helping us to our natural path, indicating when we need to adjust our lives to better attain fulfillment.